MUIC logo
  • 主页

Deliver Lecture

Deliver Lecture

There's an acknowledgement that there's a connection between higher levels in attendance and better marks in assessments, while low attendance is regarded as a lack of motivation to study. However, skipping class doesn't necessarily mean a lower performance, there will always be exceptions. There are students who do well without attending every class, and there are some students who fail despite never missing a class. Still, research shows that students who got good attendance have a greater chance of academic success (Muir, 2009). The attendance is not only for academic attainment, but also a method to encourage development of other positive behaviors, such as building social skills, developing a good attitude towards learning, people, and the surrounding community. And while nothing can compensate for the insight gained during class discussion or group activity, students shouldn't be immediately demoralized by poor attendance.

There are several video conferencing tools available out there in the market – from simply pre-recorded lessons or live-streamed videoconferencing to interactive video software. It helps boost up the communication and interaction between teachers and students when the remote learning is conducted. Besides, teachers can emphasize the use of video conferencing to encourage student participation, enrich learning experiences, and provide flexibility in terms of assessments, learning pace and accessibility.

Several strategies have been proposed to increase students' engagement behaviorally and cognitively, with the purpose of positively simulating their learning and achievement. Some common techniques include hands-on activities, discussion, autonomy support, use of mixed media, friendly competition, and gamify learning.


In the 21st century, teamwork is seen as an integral part of the learning curve both in physical and virtual classrooms. Teachers tend to bring students together to enrich learning and create more meaningful experiences. Two terms are gradually present in the educational world; cooperative and collaborative learning. They are not working against but rather complement each other. In cooperative learning, students remain autonomous, while exchanging relevant information, ideas, and resources in support of each other's goals. Lecturer directs the learning process and resources, and appoints each individual with a specific task to complete the activity. Though the students are heterogeneously set up, each individual has to master their part and share this information with others for collective understanding. Cooperative learning is basically combining members' share of the work to solve a larger problem through teacher-structured activities.


Conversely, collaborative learning is speaking to a group-structured mode of learning where students organize and allocate responsibilities among themselves. They are working individually while respecting the abilities and contribution of other group members, and progressing as a team. For the project to be successful, each part needs to come together to make a whole through sharing knowledge, making use of each other's resources, and guiding each other to achieve a common goal. Teacher's responsibility is limited to the role of facilitator whose assistance may be needed only when students ask. The learning outcomes, group performance, and final product are evaluated by its members.


Examples of cooperative and collaborative learning techniques:

Some following learning techniques can be used interchangeably across two groups, with some significant differences depending on the lecturers' practices.

合作学习技术协作学习技术
1. Jig-Saw(拼图法)
学生被分到「家庭组」。每组负责较大主题的一个子类别,称为「专家组」。「家庭组」中的每个人被分配一个特定任务,必须在这些「专家组」之间轮换学习,然后回到自己的小组教授所学内容以获得集体理解。
1. Brain Writing(头脑写作)
教师在上课前在在线平台上发布问题/主题,让学生公开或匿名分享他们对该主题的想法/观点。这种策略鼓励学生参与,特别是害羞的学生,并防止称为锚定的现象,即早期建议对讨论方向有很大影响。
2. Think-Pair-Share(思考-配对-分享)
教师创建开放式问题,让学生快速思考该主题一两分钟。然后学生与其他学生配对讨论他们的想法,之后与班级其他人分享精炼的想法以解决更大的问题。
2. Think-Pair-Share(思考-配对-分享)
学生分成对子讨论和分析给定主题,然后与班级其他人分享。
3. Round Robin(轮流发言)
3-4名学生分组并提供一个问题或主题进行讨论。每个人轮流在纸上回答(2-3句话)。然后将纸传给小组的其他成员回答。当纸回到第一个人手中时,讨论并总结每个想法以得出给定主题的答案/想法。
3. Peer Review(同伴评审)
这是学生评估的未来。学生相互观看和受到彼此作品的启发。他们被置于评估者的角色,批判性地思考如何处理工作并给予反馈,同时从同伴那里获得即时反馈中学习。
4. Numbered Heads Together(编号头脑)
学生分成四人一组。每个小组成员被分配一个1-4的数字。然后学生聚集在一起找出所提供问题的答案。教师稍后会选择一名学生作为小组发言人回答。学生必须确保他们与小组其他成员有相同的理解和知道答案,因为没有人知道会叫到哪个数字。
4. Break out group discussion(分组讨论)
学生被设置并在预定的会议中见面和头脑风暴想法。它也可以应用于Zoom、Google Meet、Team等在线学习平台,以促进学习和社区建设。
5. Three-Step Review(三步回顾)
这种策略通过积极倾听、分享信息和记笔记等活动融合了角色扮演和讨论。学生分成三人一组。每个成员轮流担任采访者、被采访者和记者的角色。
5. Socratic Seminar(苏格拉底研讨会)
目标是追求对所讨论主题的更深入理解。学生围坐成圈,讨论教师提出的开放式问题。他们提出一系列问题,听取他人的评论,批判性思考,并得出结论。
6. 3-2-1 Technique(3-2-1技术)
这种策略可以在课程中的任何时候使用,以鼓励学生反思他们的学习体验并识别不清楚的领域。基本结构包括课程中呈现的3个关键事项、支持这些想法的2件事,以及他们仍然对内容有的1个问题。学生被要求分享他们自己的答案,并与班级其他人一起看这三点。